Analysing regulatory accounts

Accounting separation is a key regulatory tool that assists national regulatory authorities (NRAs) with checking that the prices of their significant market power (SMP) operators are, where appropriate, non-discriminatory and cost-oriented. It is also a tool that can be useful in the detection of anti-competitive cross subsidies.

How we can help you

Examples of recent projects our regulation experts have carried out include:

  • auditing the regulatory cost accounts of a major European incumbent fixed-network operator –our knowledge of telecoms networks was crucial for providing an opinion on the allocation of joint and common costs, as well as the valuation of telecoms assets at ‘current cost’
  • helping an incumbent operator in the audiovisual infrastructure business to respond to regulatory actions regarding tariffs for end-user services
  • reviewing the regulatory accounts produced by the two dominant mobile operators in Spain on behalf of the regulator – we reviewed whether the accounting principles had been correctly implemented
  • an external audit of an incumbent operator’s accounting separation for a Western European regulator.

Featured Articles More articles

  • The impact of a content-filtering mandate on online service providers

    Legislators in the EU have proposed the introduction of mandatory content filters for providers of online services, intended to better protect the rights of copyrights holders. This study explores the likely impact of such an obligation on the providers of online audiovisual services and to quantify the associated direct and indirect costs and benefits. 

    Read more
  • TV regulation in a digital age

    White paper by Hogan Lovells and Analysys Mason which argues for retaining a 'three layer approach' to video regulation in the face of ongoing changes to how video content is consumed by viewers.

    Read more
  • Regulating the Sharing Economy: new wine in old bottles

    A recent decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) stated that Uber should be regulated as a transport company, and not, as claimed by Uber, as a computer services business. This is the latest in a series of challenges to the new online sharing economy, and raises significant questions as to how companies should be regulated.

    Read more